Hell Yeah! It’s Miranda For Governor! Cynthia Nixon Sets Bar For Democrats On Supporting Public Schools. Why Should We Settle for Less?

New York Candidate for Governor Actress Cynthia Nixon is Raising the Bar for Democrats

Have you seen Cynthia Nixon’s campaign advertisement announcing her run for Governor of New York? If somehow you missed it, here it is:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6C8S1XPP02s

How moving was that? Did your eyes tear up like mine did? Did you get a lump in your throat? She boldly talks about inequality. She boldly talks about public education. She talks about what every New Yorker has known for what feels like FOREVER. The city that I love, the city I was sure I would never leave has become unattainable.

It’s amazing to me that I had not only an apartment in the Village ALONE for $825/month, I also had a loft overlooking the East River in Brooklyn for just over $1200/month. As I put my daughter in the NYC public school system, the gratitude I always felt for the dedication of the teachers, the special needs department, well, to say they are doing the Lord’s work, is an understatement. I also, along with thousands of parents fought charters like Success Academy in their quest to try and take over public schools.

The city I love, the mom and pop stores, too many replaced. Chain stores everywhere. The charter industry growing. It’s heartbreaking.

When I saw that ad, I was excited. I saw a celebrity I liked talking about issues that resonated with me in a personal way. That made me have a better understanding of why many were excited about a possible Oprah run. As I previously outlined in my piece for Washington Babylon, Oprah has deep ties to the charter school industry, That is just one of many problematic issues with her positions, and the history of her show. In contrast, Nixon has a clear vision and advocacy for public schools and public school teachers. Now as a Democrat, I always thought that was our stance. I saw many of my fellow Democrats, many of which claim to be progressive, embrace Oprah and now are dismissing Cynthia Nixon.

And no one questions this.

As Democrats or left-leaning voters, we have to start asking ourselves an important question every day. And the question is this: we all know that public education is the great equalizer. Obama made a huge mistake by embracing, and taking campaign cash from entities like Democrats For Education Reform. Some centrists Democrats like Cory Booker and Kirsten Gillibrand vying for a possible 2020 presidential run are clearly moving left on issues like Medicare For All and that’s a great start. Unapologetic support for public schools, public school teachers, and public school children MUST be a bare minimum for running as a Democrat. Why should we settle for less?

Thank you, Cynthia Nixon.

Dear #Resistance We Need to Chat About the #BankLobbyistBill.

Dear #Resistance:

It's been a while since we talked and we thought it'd be nice to catch up. Have they impeached Trump yet? Hmm…well if you aren't busy let's chat a bit about something we can resist together! The Senate this week is slated to take up the so-called #BankLobbyistBill which is legislation sponsored by the Senate Banking Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-ID) that would rewrite parts of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, the landmark financial regulation overhaul enacted in response to the 2008 financial crisis.

“Sixteen Senate Democrats ignored warnings from progressives and joined with Republicans on Tuesday to advance a wide-ranging deregulation bill that lawmakers are expected to pass in the coming days.”

Senate advances bank deregulation bill as Democrats break ranks, Politico, Zachary Warmbodt

Look at these idiotic “moderate democrats” that co-sponsored S.2155 – Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act.

Slow clap to the following "Progressive All Americans," if the combined Progressive Punch Score of this team of cosponsors was a Fraternity they would all be put on academic probation, get kicked off campus and quite possibly lose their charter with national. The only member of this dream team who received an "A" from Progressive Punch is Senator Gary Peters (D-MI).

Democratic Cosponsors of S. 2155

This table includes the name of the Democratic cosponsor, the date they sponsored and their Progressive Punch score. To view the Senator's OpenSecrets.org industry level contributions click their name. If you want to view the Senator's scorecard on Progressive Punch click on their letter grade in the score column.

Democratic Cosponsor Date Cosponsored  Score
Sen. Donnelly, Joe [D-IN]* 11/16/2017 F
Sen. Heitkamp, Heidi [D-ND]* 11/16/2017 F
Sen. Tester, Jon [D-MT]* 11/16/2017 B
Sen. Warner, Mark R. [D-VA]* 11/16/2017 F
Sen. McCaskill, Claire [D-MO]* 11/16/2017 D
Sen. Manchin, Joe, III [D-WV]* 11/16/2017 F
Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]* 11/16/2017 D
Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]* 11/16/2017 A
Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]* 12/06/2017 F
Sen. Carper, Thomas R. [D-DE] 12/06/2017 F
Sen. Jones, Doug [D-AL] 12/06/2017 F

It’s good to see the bastions of banking interests included…you know Alabama, Colorado, WV, MT, ND represented. How many bankers do you work in Montana? Well according to the Montana Bankers Association there are 48 distinct member banks, about 12 of which are just branches of the same bank. Not exactly the type of industry numbers worth turning the financial world on its head for right? It’s not about the community banks, it isn't about their states and it certainly isn’t about you or me.

For a brief explanation of what this bill entails and the ramifications, let’s hear what Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has to say to rally her fellow Senators against the bill:

“"The people in Congress may have forgotten the crash 10 years ago, but I guarantee that people across this country have not forgotten the pain that these giant banks caused,” “They do not want to see Congress move toward deregulating these banks.”

Elizabeth Warren in Comments on Senate Floor

David Dayen of the Intercept has been dissecting and synthesizing the impact of this legislation better than anyone. The whole piece is brilliant but this passage is a must read:

The discussion turned to an obscure congressional bill, S.2155, pitched by its bipartisan supporters mainly as a vehicle to deliver regulatory relief to community banks and, 10 years after the financial crisis, to make needed technical fixes to the landmark Wall Street reform law, Dodd-Frank.

But Citi’s Chief Financial Officer John Gerspach told the trade reporters he thought that some bigger banks — like, say, Citigroup — should get taken care of in the bill as well. He wanted Congress to loosen rules around how the bank could go about lending and investing. The specific mechanism to do that was to fiddle with what’s known as the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, a key capital requirement for the nation’s largest banks. This simple ratio sets how much equity banks must carry compared to total assets like loans.”

Revenge of the Stadium Banks, The Intercept, David Dayen

David Dayen knows a thing or two about the foreclosure crisis. His book Chain of Title: How Three Ordinary Americans Uncovered Wall Street's Great Foreclosure Fraud should be required reading on this topic. Here's what he says about what this means:

“A hopeful nation — and the president himself — expected that the Senate would begin debate on major gun policy reform next week, but instead a confounding scenario has emerged: In the typically gridlocked Congress, with the Trump legislative agenda mostly stalled, members of both parties will come together to roll back financial rules, during the 10th anniversary of the biggest banking crisis in nearly a century. And it’s happening with virtually no media attention whatsoever.Aside from the gifts to Citigroup and other big banks, the bill undermines fair lending rules that work to counter racial discrimination and rolls back regulation and oversight on large regional banks that aren’t big enough to be global names, but have enough cash to get a stadium named after themselves. In the name of mild relief for community banks, these institutions — which have been christened “stadium banks” by congressional staff opposing the legislation — are punching a gaping hole through Wall Street reform.”

Revenge of the Stadium Banks, The Intercept, David Dayen

This is serious business and some Democratic legislators are fighting the good fight. Here is what Senator Warren tweeted out:

Warren is hardly the only Democrat who has joined advocacy groups in opposing this horrific bill, which would gut the already limited Dodd-Frank regulations put in place by the Obama administration following the 2008 crash, Sherrod Brown (D-OH) also has come out against the bill asking fellow Senators:

“Are you with the big banks and the Wall Street operators who wrecked the economy and got big bailouts, or are you with families and workers?"

Sherrod Brown in Comments on the Senate Flooor

Here's what Senator Sanders (I-VT) said in a press release:

"This banking bill is a disaster. The Wall Street crash of 2008 showed the American people how fraudulent many of these large banks are. The last thing we should be doing is deregulating them. As the Congressional Budget Office reported today, the bill that the Senate will be considering this week will 'increase the likelihood that a large financial firm with assets of between $100 billion and $250 billion would fail.' Why would any member of Congress vote to move us closer to another taxpayer bailout of large financial institutions? This bill must be defeated," said Sanders, the ranking member of the Budget Committee”

Press Release from Senator Bernie Sanders,  "CBO: Bank Deregulation Bill Would Lead to More Bailouts" Tuesday, March 6, 2018

Sincerely,

Mary Angela Perna

Support Lush Left